Open Access and Scholarly Communication
Research Impact
Research Impact
Measuring the value of research and scholarship is an important but extremely difficult to task. Impact is best understood as a story–with many characters, settings, audiences, and lessons–that metrics help tell. Metrics, such as citation analysis, help demonstrate value, but they can’t possibly make up the complete picture of any researcher’s impact nor any study’s value. Impact, productivity, and performance are complex. Relying on one single number or factor to assess any of these is problematic and very likely to be misleading.
Given the caveats above, the following are the most commonly used types of impact metrics, usually related to number of citations:
- Journal-level metrics
- Researcher-level metrics
- Article-level metrics (usually in the sciences and social sciences)
- Monograph-level metrics (usually in the humanities)
- Alternative metrics (new developments in bibliometrics and scientometrics)
For more information on impact metrics, or for help with citation analysis, use the Research Impact Toolkit. Bear in mind that most of the measures in the toolkit look at academics’ use of research. Factors such as community impact or clinical impact are much more difficult to determine. |
Recent News
More News- UT Libraries Collection Review: Facts and Questions
- UT Libraries Reviewing Physical Collections to Meet Campus Needs
- Mental Wellness Lunch & Learn
- Carolyn Finney on Race and the Great Outdoors: Whose Stories Do We Tell?
- Amythyst Kiah: free performance March 20 at KMA
- Medbery Makerspace: Take our Certification Workshop
- Exhibit in Special Collections Honors Frederick Douglass, Black History Month
- Library Storage Annex Update from UT Knoxville Campus Advisory Board Meeting