Scholars’ Collaborative
Measuring the value of research and scholarship is an important but extremely difficult to task. Impact is best understood as a story–with many characters, settings, audiences, and lessons–that metrics help tell. Metrics, such as citation analysis, help demonstrate value, but they can’t possibly make up the complete picture of any researcher’s impact nor any study’s value. Impact, productivity, and performance are complex. Relying on one single number or factor to assess any of these is problematic and very likely to be misleading.
Given the caveats above, the following are the most commonly used types of impact metrics, usually related to number of citations:
- Journal-level metrics
- Researcher-level metrics
- Article-level metrics (usually in the sciences and social sciences)
- Monograph-level metrics (usually in the humanities)
- Alternative metrics (new developments in bibliometrics and scientometrics)
For more information on impact metrics, or for help with citation analysis, use the Research Impact Toolkit. Bear in mind that most of the measures in the toolkit look at academics’ use of research. Factors such as community impact or clinical impact are much more difficult to determine. |
The Open Sandbox
Join us for an exploration of open source digital research tools. Workshops are open to all.

Recent News
More News- Henry Luce Foundation Grant to Fund Programs Highlighting Beauford Delaney Papers
- Writing Blitz, March 29
- Do you know where your next meal is coming from?
- A Conversation with Appalachian Filmmakers
- Early Printed Bibles on View during Shakespeare Symposium
- Accessible to All — Resources to Learn More About Disabilities
- Financial Hardship and Food Insecurity on Campus: Panel Discussion, March 9
- Share Your UT Libraries Love Story!
Upcoming Events
More Events-
Barbara Dombrowski - “Tropic Ice” Exhibit, Screening and Lecture at Hodges Library
-
Barbara Dombrowski - “Tropic Ice” Exhibit, Screening and Lecture at Hodges Library
-
Game Night