family mexican man
smiling two mexican women
sitting mexican man scene in
immigration office at mexican border mother reading to children

The New Latino Immigration to Tennessee:
Opportunities and Challenges

UT Conference Center, 600 Henley St., Knoxville, TN 37902
March 31 - April 1, 2006


Home

Schedule

Speakers

Sponsors

Continuing
Education
Opportunities


Film
Series


Information
Resources


Links

Contacts

"Persons, Communities, and Nations"
Research Panel #4
Saturday, April 1, 2006
1:30 - 3:00
Concurrent Sessions




De Ann Pendry
Lecturer in Anthropology
University of Tennessee

"Examining the Reproduction of Stereotypes about Low-Income Mexican Americans: Learning from the Past to Improve Health Care in the Future"
This paper discusses how the logic of diabetes care and health-belief models dovetails with persistent stereotypes about Mexican or Mexican American culture as traditional and fatalistic and reproduces them as possible explanations for patient behavior, presumed non-compliance, and/or poor health outcomes. Such explanations obscure the effects on health care of poverty, racism, and (for a large proportion of Latino migrants to new destinations) undocumented status. Based on ethnographic research conducted in South Texas, I outline reasons why a number of health care providers working in public clinics there assumed that their low-income Mexican American diabetes patients lacked knowledge and motivation. I also highlight provider practices that were based on respect for the patients' knowledge and culture and an appreciation of their lifeworld concerns. Insights gained from these practices can be used to help enhance the understanding of health care and other service providers working with the increasing numbers of Latino migrants to new destinations.



Stephanie Bohon
Assistant Professor of Sociology
University of Georgia

"Mexican Self-Employment in Old and New Latino Places"
Entering into self-employment is one of the quickest ways for immigrants to achieve income levels commensurate with natives. Mexicans, who traditionally have much lower levels of self-employment than other immigrant groups, are now entering into entrepreneurial ventures at greater rates. This paper compares Mexican immigrant self-employment rates in established Latino metropolitan areas with rates in new Latino destinations and determines if the factors that predict self-employment in traditional receiving destinations also predict self-employment in emerging gateways.



Tom Janoski
Associate Professor of Sociology
University of Kentucky

"The Ironies of Immigration and Naturalization in Advanced Industrialized Countries."
Policies toward strangers who want to come to a nation's shores are shaped by demography, economics, politics and long term institutional structures. In the case of immigration, the long-term decline in birth rates and fertility of advanced industrialized countries have led to a need for immigrants whether they be guest workers, full-fledged immigrants, or illegal immigrants. Most of the demographic migratory transition is backed by economic needs, though military and political forces have also played a role. Many political forces lead to long-term institutional structures that reinforce or deter immigration, and they form four immigration regime types based on imperial or colonizing empires, former colonies that become settler countries, long-term countries of emigration, and social democratic countries. But many of the factors that lead to immigration do not provide much of the explanation of actually making immigrants citizens of the nation-state - naturalization. Immigration has little or no correlation with naturalization, though naturalization could not occur without immigration. Demographic forces are the basis for immigration but not naturalization. Instead, long term institutional forces, which are measured by a 'barrier to naturalization index' based on naturalization law are strongly connected to naturalization, and they embed themselves within the regime types just mentioned - empires, settler countries, emigrating, and social democratic countries. However, the ironies involved in immigration and naturalization are that countries that most opposed immigration and naturalization - Germany and Belgium - have reversed their laws and have recently accepted much more liberal regime types; while countries that most supported immigration and naturalization - the UK, France, and Denmark - have immigration and naturalization rates have recently tightened and do not really reflect their past history.

These explanations will be supported by comparative historical evidence, cross-sectional analyses of the post-WWII period, and a pooled time-series and cross-sectional analysis of 18 advanced industrialized countries.



Send questions, comments to:
Conference Questions

Last updated March 13, 2006